<< September 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



Monday, September 13, 2004
Benjamin Rankin land transactions

I have access to the Frederick Co deed index. This is quite an interesting index, I hope I can keep it around for a while as there may be many interesting things in it.

I had only a few minutes to look at it, and put a few entries here. I did in fact find the Helm listings also, but there are pages and pages; I'll have to scan that part. It's not an easy index to use, the quick index was filmed badly and you have to pick thru it to find the names.

The Ben Rankin entries:

1766 7 Sep 1766 Rankin Benjamin from George Johnston ux deed 11 162
1771 08 May 1771 " " " William Davis ux deed 14 57
1792 02 Oct 1792 Rankins Benjamin " Denny Fairfax lease 23 303
1792 02 Oct 1792 Rankins William " Denny Fairfax lease 24a 152


The 2 entries after 1787 are interesting; perhaps they are related to the ferry, as the Fairfaxes held some of the land around the Shenandoah, but how is Benjamin Rankin involved after his death? Or is this going to hint at another Rankin family connection, like the case of David Fulton?

There are other Rankin transactions, with Hugh &al, but will have to wait for later.

George Johnston
This is a well-known name & landholder in this territory, in the years before the revolution. However, if we look at O'Dell's map 3 and tract 14, we see Johnston was the owner of land along the Shenandoah as of 1760, right in the place where I claim Mount Hammond lay. Not conclusive until we see the deeds tho. But it could mean that "Mt Hammond" was the first land Rankin acquired. Almost certainly his son-in-law James Hammond added acreage to it.

This might smooth over the obvious problem we have with Judy Beeler -> Judith Rankin; if true, she lost her "own" land, some of it might possibly have gone to her step-daughter. But if she retained possession of the family plantation this exchange might have been acceptable to her. Julie thinks, however, that the tract Thomas R Hammond inherited, and that James L Hooff (his nephew) lived on in 1852, is the Beeler dower share. The size is a pretty good fit for Judy Beeler's share. The Frederick and 1790's Berkeley deeds will have to answer this.

Posted at 9/13/2004 3:12:48 pm by Michael Helm

 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry